Maybe that has been overcome? And you could see a 300 PHY? The use of 5ghz N on freebsd has been problematic as well, in the past.
(2 streams, 20 VHT) So real world with a 2 stream client you typical see in the 70mbps range.
A more realistic high end phy for 2.4 is 144.4. Which is not a an official standard for 2.4 N, and almost never without issues trying to leverage it. For 450 to be possible you would also need to be using 40 VHT. They love to throw out these phy values - that are very unlikely to ever be seen or used in real world. That all said and good ) What clients have 3x3? Your phone? Your tablet? Your laptop? Iot devices? What are you using for wifi said in wifi 6 card compatiility: What is the make up of all your wifi devices? Most iot sort of device only do 2.4 for example. I wouldn't jump on that bandwagon quite yet to be honest. That you will even be able to notice/use correctly. Unless you have devices, that will actually take advantage of it. etc.Įdit: Do you have wifi6 devices, while its always fun to have the latest and greatest new thing on the market. If you need more coverage - you get more AP. Then get a AP that supports that, that you can actually place where it best makes sense for best coverage of the area you want wifi in. If you want good wifi, ie you talking 6 for example. And even if you can, doesn't look very good. You will be way happier in the long for sure.Ĭombining the AP with the router has never been a good idea - for starters it rarely allows you to correctly place the AP for best coverage. Take whatever money you were going to spend on some card, and put it towards your AP. The suggest advice of getting an AP to use is be the best advice your going to get to be honest. Let alone 6.įreebsd and wifi not a good mix. Freebsd support for wifi 5 - I don't even think is a thing.
0 kommentar(er)
